“Daniel, sit up! Didn’t you hear me? Your glass of milk is about to spill. Wait! Don’t set it down on the edge of the napkin, that won’t be safe, either.” Later, I would blame myself for having made the dinner time less pleasant than it might have been. Of course, Daniel could hear. He could hear a pin drop three rooms away. That did not mean I could get his attention the way I could get the attention of his brothers and sisters—or that he could respond the way they did when it came to tasks like cleaning up  his room. I tested his hearing myself, then had it tested again through the school. Nothing wrong there, we were told. He wasn’t a “bad” child; he was affectionate, expressive, humorous, especially kind to the pets, intelligent with a prodigious memory; and he tried very hard to do some things.

I recognized other behaviors as dyslexic long before he began school: his confusion of letters, lack of interest in learning to read—although he loved to be read to—and his awkward motor control. At school, all the classic symptoms of dyslexia appeared on schedule. Tests with exceptional highs and lows; supported learning; problems with a few teachers but never with his friends; compensatory behaviors; counselling; meetings; intensive reading one-on-one; growing frustration; growing confusion. Why? How are we failing? Does anyone have any idea how to fix this?

Dr. Alfred Tomatis was fascinated by the way the behavior of his patients changed when their ears were exposed to filtered, high-frequency sound. He began his career treating ears with specific frequencies of sound to correct professional singers’ voices. He observed that the singers with the best voices are right-lateralized and he used filtered music to enhance that “leading ear” (the right ear is dominant in most people) making the person “more right-lateralized.” He thought the resulting changes in the singer’s posture, self-confidence, and energy were “psychological” as well as physical. His book for singers and those who intend to train singers analyzes the separate parts of the middle and inner ear for their particular contributions to vocal production and he describes the parts of the brain involved in singing. In the course of his research and medical practice he made a remarkable scientific discovery: the voice (larynx) can produce only the frequencies (harmonics) likely to be heard by the ear. The ear controls the voice or, as he liked to say, “We sing with our ears.” Proof of his discovery, The Tomatis Effect, was recognized by the French Academy of Medicine (1957).

Then, Tomatis noticed that his techniques for improving the singing voice applied also to spoken language: those who lisped or stuttered or garbled words or felt often at a loss for words. He had expanded his attention and his practice from the singing voice to spoken language and some of the symptoms of dyslexia. The other problems in writing language and reading language that characterize dyslexia soon caught his attention because “retraining” the ear affects behaviors that seem remote from the voice. He wrote about those neurological relationships in The Ear and Language.

By then, extremes of behavior had become his next frontier; he was convinced that infantile schizophrenia must also be related to the “listening” ability of the ear. He could prove that sound stimulation changed such extreme behavior in autistic children, but he listened to the theories of his colleagues in psychiatry who came up with an odious explanation of autism, blaming the mother. His colleague, Dr. Guy Bérard, was so disgusted he left their collaboration to gain his own medical specialty in otolaryngology, then continued with similar success to treat a widening range of behaviors. Bérard wrote a slim book called Hearing Equals Behavior, which extends the frontier of knowledge about the ears’ influence on behavior to suicidal depression. He describes a characteristic profile of audio-processing deficits in either ear but especially the left causing depression; he cured almost all of his patients applying his version of the Tomatis Method of ear stimulation.

I knew nothing of Bérard’s work or his connection with Tomatis when I wrote my book about Daniel. In fact, it was only in the last stages of my writing that I obtained Tomatis’s books and was able to revise my neurological explanation from his anatomical teaching. Many factors isolating us in our care of Daniel contrived to create a “laboratory setting” for my learning. Although we viewed our family of seven in the perspective of our beliefs and the usual “psychological” interpretations of behavior, Daniel—and other people having extreme experiences—kept me open, seeking, and on edge about inadequacies in my knowledge and beliefs. Too many things seemed to be going badly wrong.  Yet, some people seemed to think that, as parents go, we were doing a pretty good job. It didn’t feel like that to me. Although we were in tough social circumstances by North American standards, how many of the problems coming home to roost could be blamed on the social order? Lots. But I had to keep looking for better solutions to the extreme behaviors of those around me.

When Daniel’s alternating cerebral dominance became clear to me, most of those questions about inadequacies in my knowledge base, including my religious beliefs, were answered. I had found the piece of the puzzle Tomatis had been missing in the “flip-flopping” lateralization he had dismissed. Some people are physiologically incapable of normal behavior. Now I knew why. Their problems are not “psychological” but neurological, beginning with their ears. And, thanks to the Tomatis Method we had experienced, I had an idea of how they might be treated!

The health of the middle and inner ear is essential to normal behaviour. The spectrum of human behaviour, including so-called “mental” illnesses, is generated in the ear.

You can buy Listening for the Light to learn more about the neurological relationship between the ear and the brain that allows high-frequency music to heal dyslexia, schizophrenia, bipolarity, chronic fatigue syndrome,  substance abuse, and other behaviors related to diminished or lost left-brain dominance.

3 Responses to Blame?

  1. I need to send this piece to my daughter who is a speech pathologist.
    By the way, Laurna, you write extremely well.

  2. locw says:

    Hello Laurna,
    As someone who went through Zoloft withdrawal 3 years ago I have loved reading your site. It has taken me sometime to recover. I am not fully recovered in the slightest sense either. I can function in some ways, but others not so well.I see that you promote the right ear being stimulated, but that Dr. Bernard used the left ear. For someone emotionally out of touch and has a lack of emotions what would you suggest?

    My left ear has tinnitus and used to have hyperacusis when I was withdrawing. My emotions were coming back recently, but mostly just depressing feelings.


    • WildRose says:

      Hello, Thanks for commenting. If you want to delve into this a little further, feel free to email me. In general, each ear has a specialized function: the right ear is more concerned with the left-brain and the left ear is more concerned with the right-brain. Both ears are connected to both halves of the brain, but with a preponderance of nerve connections to the opposite side. The right ear controls the dominance of the LEFT-brain in integrative functions, which means it is the dominant ear for most types of behaviour — learning, self-control, and the rationalized belief system. The left ear has a stronger influence on the right, emotional half of the brain. The left ear is usually the problem in depression.

      Zoloft will have reached both your ears. Whatever your underlying ear condition was before you took it, the drug may have made that condition worse. Some people take Zoloft for a situational depression, i.e., for an acute sadness due to the death of a person dear to one, the breakup of a relationship, or some other disappointment. Those people may have had perfect hearing but the drug will temporarily suppress their feelings, which is the desired effect. Later, when the person has become accustomed to the new reality, the ear may not “bounce back” from the drug’s effect on the stapedius muscle. If one or the other ear had weakness in that muscle, it likely will have become even weaker. Thus, the very familiar “SSRI Withdrawal Syndrome” effect, where the person no longer feels as sad about the loss, but has become unwell in other ways.

      I spent some time at a forum where people were discussing those sorts of symptoms. They were offering summaries of their symptoms to researchers, so I downloaded them and analyzed them in my report “Ear Function in SSRI Withdrawal.” Just over one hundred people reported over 2000 symptoms, tinnitus and depression among them. I recognized those symptoms because of the range of symptoms various members of our family had dealt with: everything from chronic fatigue syndrome and dyslexia through bipolarity II and I and schizophrenia, and from many other people I know who have struggled with mental illness and addictions. In other words, the symptoms of SSRI withdrawal syndrome are the same symptoms as those I have seen healed with music stimulation.

      It is important not to overdo amplified listening. Two hours maximum per day; you can listen to as much moderate ambient sound — the radio, CDs, etc. that plays through the air. You do not have to pay attention to the music; it is sufficient that the ear be exposed to it. The purpose is to exercise the stapedius muscle of the ear that is designed for high-frequency sound. Think in terms of violins — Mozart violin concertos were Tomatis’s preferred form of music. Although Tomatis filtered that music so the client would receive more purely high-frequency sound, I think that is not essential. If I can cure severe schizophrenia, bipolarity, dyslexia, depression, and other problems with ordinary CDs of classical music, I think it is likely that you can, too.

      You can listen binaurally — both ears — because both ears likely were affected by the medication. After a few days of binaural listening, you could give special attention to your left ear for a few days. Then, return to binaural or try right-eared listening. And do feel free to email me and let me know what’s happening from day to day. I would be delighted to hear how your experiment is coming along.
      Best regards,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *